Partial fair value = current BTC value/share (marked to spot) + present value of FCF-funded future BTC accretion/share. MSTR is shown net of its senior stack by default (toggle above). Operating business value is excluded in Phase 1, so premium/discount overstates richness for operating-heavy names (XYZ, greyed). Sorted by premium/discount ascending. Click a row for detail.
| Ticker | Share price | BTC/share | BTC value/sh | Deploy. FCF/sh | PV accretion/sh | Partial FV/sh | Prem / disc | Conf. |
|---|
| Year | BTC price (avg) | FCF deployed/sh | BTC bought/sh | Cum. BTC bought/sh |
|---|
Current BTC value/share → (− net senior stack, MSTR only) → + PV of FCF-funded accretion/share → = Partial fair value/share. Operating leg omitted (Phase 2); total is labelled partial.
Phase 1 values only the two bankable legs of a hybrid Bitcoin-treasury company: the BTC it already owns, and the future BTC it can buy out of self-generated free cash flow. The operating business (a DCF leg) and any externally-funded accretion (ATM / convert raises) are deliberately excluded — they arrive in later phases.
Partial FV/share = CurrentBTCValue/share − (net senior stack/share, MSTR) + PV(FCF-funded BTC accretion)/share
CurrentBTCValue/share = (BTC held ÷ diluted shares) × BTC spot — marked to spot, not discounted.
MSTR's headline defaults to net fair value: BTC NAV/share less its senior stack, netted at face value. Senior stack uses the current mNAV back-office cap-structure snapshot (2026-05-26): preferred $15.478B + convertible notes $6.754B − cash $0.871B = $21.36B net senior obligations. At MSTR's price the converts are deep out-of-the-money, so the if-converted case collapses into the net case and is not shown as a separate toggle. Untick "net MSTR of senior stack" above to see gross BTC NAV/share. Net basis uses the current MCP cap-structure snapshot (2026-05-26); the 10-Q (2026-03-31) cross-check yields +36%. MSTR reconciliation tie-out pending.
Each year a slice of normalized deployable FCF (Allocation %) buys BTC at that year's modelled price. Those coins are held to the horizon and the whole future-bought stack is marked to the horizon BTC price, then discounted back at the treasury discount rate:
coins_t = (DeployableFCF/sh × Alloc) ÷ P_t · PV accretion/sh = (Σ coins_t) × P_horizon ÷ (1+r)^H
This is the agreed reading of the spec's anti-double-counting rule: the rule guards the currently-held leg from being re-appreciated, but future-bought coins are allowed to appreciate to the horizon — which is what makes the BTC scenario (Q25/Q50/Q75) actually move fair value. The currently-held leg owns its repricing once (at spot, today); the future leg owns its repricing once (at the horizon).
Prices come from the locked power-law quantile model behind mnav…/btc/power-law/: ln(P_τ) = a_τ + b_τ·ln(H), with block height mapped forward at 144 blocks/day. Each year's price is a log-linear path from today's spot to the chosen quantile's power-law value at the horizon. Q25 / Q50 / Q75 = Low / Base / High; Q1 / Q99 are opt-in tail stress only.
Ideally OCF − maintenance capex − mandatory debt service − min-liquidity Δ ± working-capital normalization. Where those line items aren't separately disclosed, Phase 1 uses a best-effort normalized annual FCF (held flat across the horizon, per the locked formula) and flags the confidence. If deployable FCF is negative it is clamped to zero accretion (MSTR's and SWC's operating cash flow is negative, so their fair value here is pure BTC NAV/share).
high — directly disclosed medium — derived from disclosed inputs low — estimated (exact maintenance capex / WC not disclosed). Row flag = lowest of the inputs that feed fair value, where the deployable-FCF confidence counts only when accretion is non-clamped. A clamp (negative/zero deployable FCF) is surfaced as a separate FCF clamped badge so it can't silently raise the dot.
All comparison values are USD/share. CASH3 (BRL) and SWC (GBX) are converted at live FX; detail pages can show local currency on request.
BTC scenarios — the power-law quantile model HVPS reuses for its price paths.
Per-company BTC NAV regression — an alternative read on how each company's BTC NAV/share tracks BTC.
Per-company BTC accumulation — the companion stacking curves.